Bass Win Casino Poker Strategies for Consistent Profit Using Position and Bankroll Control

Use a tight-aggressive opening range: in early seats play roughly the top 15–18% of hands (big pairs, suited broadways, A‑x suited); in middle seats widen to 20–25%; on cutoff and button open 40–50% and pressure blinds with 3.5x–4x raise sizing.

Bankroll rules and session limits: maintain at least 30–40 full buy-ins for cash tables at a given stake; set an absolute session stop‑loss of 3 buy-ins and a profit‑take at 1–2 buy-ins to protect roll and lock gains; track hourly net in big blinds to detect leaks early.

Bet sizing and equity thresholds: c‑bet flop in single‑opponent pots at 55–70% pot when range advantage exists, reduce to 30–45% when multiway; use pot odds math: call when hand equity exceeds required equity (example: a 2:1 pot requires >33% equity); adopt 2.2–3.0x sizing on value bets versus calling stations to extract thin value without bloating pots against sticky ranges.

Table selection and opponent profiling: prefer tables where average voluntary put‑in‑pot (VPIP) > 28% and preflop raise (PFR) < 12% among three or more players; label players quickly – tag as passive callers when fold‑to‑cbet < 30% and exploit with larger turn value bets; isolate limpers with 3.5–4x raises when you hold position and a hand with >50% equity against a single caller.

Data, sample sizes, and mental discipline: evaluate results over 50k–100k hands to distinguish skill from variance; aim for a long‑term rate of 2–6 big blinds per 100 hands in cash formats at micro‑to‑mid stakes as a realistic target; keep session notes on 10 most common opponents and review hands with a solver at least twice weekly; if a tilt episode costs >2 buy‑ins, stop and analyze aggression patterns that led to the loss before returning.

Choosing the Best Variant and Stakes to Maximize ROI

Primary recommendation: concentrate on full-ring No-Limit Hold’em cash at $0.10/$0.25 up to $0.25/$0.50, keep a bankroll of 250–300 buy-ins, target a winrate of 2–5 bb/100; expect 60–100 hands per hour with hourly earnings roughly $0.4–$2.0 depending on exact stake and winrate.

Bankroll math example: at $0.25/$0.50 (BB = $0.50) a 250-buyin reserve equals $12,500. A 3 bb/100 winrate at 80 hands/hour produces ~$1.20 per hour; 100 playing hours per month yields $120 monthly, which equals ~0.96% monthly ROI and ~11.5% annualized ROI when extrapolated linearly.

Cash-game recommendations

Micro stakes (0.01/0.02 to 0.05/0.10): bankroll 200–300 buy-ins; target 3–6 bb/100. Low stakes (0.10/0.25 to 0.25/0.50): bankroll 250–350 buy-ins; target 2–5 bb/100. 6-max tables: raise bankroll to 300–400 buy-ins due to higher variance; expect larger winrate swings than full-ring. Pot-Limit Omaha (PLO): allocate 500–1,000 buy-ins because variance is substantially higher; only move up after a clear edge appears in a large sample.

Tournaments and SNGs

Single-table SNGs (9-max): recommended stakes $5–$30; bankroll 150–250 buy-ins; target ROI 20–40% measured across several hundred entries. Multi-table tournaments (MTTs): expect high variance; maintain 1,000–2,000 buy-ins at target buy-in; assess viability via ROI, ITM rate and Cash Factor across 1,000+ entries before stepping up stakes.

Sample size and movement rules: require a minimum of 100k hands for usable cash winrate estimates; prefer 200k+ for stronger confidence in bb/100. Move up one stake only when three conditions coexist: long-run winrate above 4–5 bb/100, sample size >100k hands, bankroll ≥300 buy-ins at the prospective stake. Move down one level immediately when bankroll falls below 200 buy-ins at current stake or when negative multi-month trends exceed expected variance boundaries (use standard deviation of hourly results to set thresholds).

Table selection metrics to exploit: target tables where average opponent VPIP >30% combined with PFR <15%, initial raise percentage below 20% and limp rate above 15%. Avoid tables dominated by high 3-bet percentages (individual players >8%). Prioritize seat selection next to loose-passive players rather than high-frequency regulars.

Tracking and adjustments: log bb/100, hands played, hourly, ROI and opponent tendencies each session. Reassess stakes monthly using statistical thresholds listed above; separate short-term luck from skill with redline analysis and peer-benchmarked samples before any permanent stake change.

Bankroll Rules: Session and Tournament Allocation to Avoid Busts

Limit single-session exposure to 2% of your total roll; cap each MTT-style buy-in at 1% of roll and lower to 0.5% for very large-field or re-entry formats.

• Definition: “roll” = funds solely reserved for card-table play; keep a separate reserve equal to 50% of the roll for recovery needs.
• Session stop limits:
  • Stop-loss per session: 1.5%–2.5% of roll (use 2% as default).
  • Stop-win per session: 3%–6% of roll; lock winnings into reserve once reached.
  • If stop-loss triggered twice in 7 days, downshift stakes immediately.
• Cash-style allocation (cash tables / deep-stack formats):
  • Conservative: 40 buy-ins at stake level (buy-in = typical full-stack buy amount).
  • Standard: 25 buy-ins.
  • Aggressive: 15 buy-ins (only with demonstrated edge and reduced session risk).
  • Example: $10,000 roll → standard cash buy-in = $400 max.
• Sit-and-go / Single-table events:
  • Conservative: 100 buy-ins.
  • Standard: 50 buy-ins.
  • Example: $5,000 roll → standard SNG buy-in = $100.
• Multi-table tournaments (MTTs) / large-field events:
  • Conservative: 300 buy-ins for high-variance fields (re-entries, thousands of entrants).
  • Standard: 100–200 buy-ins for regular MTTs.
  • Aggressive: 50 buy-ins only for small-field, low-variance opens.
  • Example: $20,000 roll → standard MTT buy-in ≈ $200 (100 buy-ins).
• Rebuys and re-entries:
  • Cap total rebuys per event to 25% of roll.
  • Never rebuy if the rebuy would push total session exposure above 5% of roll.
• Adjustment ladder (automatic rules):
  • Lose 10% of roll in one calendar week → move down one stake level and halve session cap until rebuilt.
  • Lose 20% of roll overall → move down two levels and restrict buy-ins to conservative buy-in counts until roll recovers by 30%.
  • Promote up one level only after a 25% increase in roll or completion of 100 buy-ins at current level with net positive results.
• Bankroll allocation split (practical):
  • Play pool: 66% of total funds (active roll).
  • Reserve pool: 34% (used only to rebuild after drawdown; not for daily play).
  • Example: $15,000 total funds → $9,900 play pool, $5,100 reserve.
• Session checklist (before seating):
  • Confirm session stake keeps exposure ≤2% of total roll.
  • Set strict stop-loss and stop-win amounts in software or phone alarm.
  • Block rebuys that would exceed session cap.
• Recovery protocol:
  • After a 30% drawdown: allocate 100% of playable winnings to reserve until roll restored to target level.
  • Only resume normal buy-in policy after two consecutive profitable months or after reaching the predefined rebuild threshold.

Table Selection: Identifying Soft Tables and Exploitable Opponents Quickly

Sit down only if within the first 25 hands you identify at least two opponents with VPIP ≥30% and PFR ≤12% (or a VPIP−PFR gap ≥15); otherwise leave the seat immediately.

Collect these metrics fast: VPIP, PFR, limp frequency (limps per orbit), fold-to-3‑bet, fold-to-cbet (flop), WTSD (went to showdown) and aggression factor (AF). Thresholds that indicate weakness: limp-per-orbit >1.0, fold-to-3‑bet >65%, fold-to-cbet (flop) >60%, WTSD >30% combined with AF <1.0. If you have a HUD, watch these over 25–50 hands; if manual, mark L, C, R per hand and convert to percentages (count ÷ hands observed ×100).

Stack-size profile matters: prefer tables where most stacks sit between 60–200 big blinds for implied-value lines; if you execute short-stack push/fold tactics, select tables with a high proportion (≥40%) of stacks between 20–50 big blinds. Avoid tables where more than three seats are occupied by players showing steady PFR ≥18% and 3‑bet ≥6% (indicates tougher opposition).

Immediate exploitive actions

If two or more weak opponents are present, apply these concrete adjustments: open-range expansion from CO/BTN (raise to 2.2–2.8bb vs unopened); isolation sizes vs limpers: 3.5–5bb against a single limper, 6–8bb against multiple limpers. Versus players with fold-to-3‑bet >65% increase 3‑bet frequency for both value and light 3‑bets; reduce bluff 3‑bets when callers are common. Against calling stations (WTSD high, AF low) use larger value bets on turn/river (70–85% pot) and avoid multi-street bluffs; against high fold-to-cbet opponents employ smaller flop c-bets (35–50% pot) and exploit by barreling thinner when turn fold numbers remain high.

Quick table audit (25 hands)

Checklist: 1) Count hands; 2) For each seat record raises, limps, folds-to-3‑bet, showdowns; 3) Calculate VPIP and PFR; 4) Label seat exploitable if VPIP ≥30 & PFR ≤12 or WTSD ≥30 with AF ≤1.0; 5) Join only if ≥2 exploitable seats and stack profile fits your postflop or shove plan. Execute isolation raises and the sizing rules above immediately after joining.

Preflop Ranges and Bet Sizing: What to Open, 3‑bet, and Fold by Position

Open 2.5bb from unopened seats in cash 6‑max (3bb in 9‑max); 3‑bet to ~9–11bb versus 2.5bb opens; commit to folding most non‑premium holdings to a single sizable 3‑bet from early position with 100bb stacks.

• General sizing rules (100bb cash):

  • Default open: 2.5bb from EP–BTN; 3.0–3.5bb when multiple limpers or short stacks at table.
  • 3‑bet (vs 2.5bb open): 9–11bb (≈3.5–4.5× the open). Versus 3bb open, 3‑bet to 10–12bb.
  • 4‑bet (polar): 26–30bb IP as a value/isolating sizing; small stacked play (<60bb) switch to shove ranges.
  • Adjust sizes +10–20% vs very loose opponents; +0.5–1bb when deep‑stacked (150bb+).

• 6‑max position blueprint – open / 3‑bet / fold

  • UTG (open ~12%):

    • Open examples: 22+, AJs+, AQo+, KQs, sometimes KQo.
    • 3‑bet range vs callers from later seats: value only (QQ+, AKs, AKo); occasional light 3‑bet: A5s, KJs vs very wide CO/BTN opens.
    • Fold vs a competent 3‑bet unless holding QQ+/AK.

  • MP / HJ (open ~16–20%):

    • Open examples: 22+, ATs+, ATo+, KQs, KJs, QJs, JTs, T9s.
    • 3‑bet range vs later opens: value + selective bluffs (AQs, AJs, A5s, KTs, suited connectors like 98s) – ~4–6% 3‑bet freq.
    • Fold hands like ATo, KJo to large 3‑bets from early if stacks deep and opponent is tight.

  • Cutoff (open ~25–30%):

    • Open examples: 22+, A9s+, ATo+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, all suited connectors 76s+.
    • 3‑bet vs BTN: mix of value and bluffs – 6–10% overall; include combos like A5s, K9s, Q9s, 76s.
    • Fold small offsuit connectors and weak offsuit broadways to large 3‑bets unless IP postflop edge is huge.

  • Button (open ~45–60%):

    • Open very wide: all pairs, Ax suited, broadways, suited connectors down to 54s, most suited one‑gappers, many offsuit broadways.
    • 3‑bet vs SB/BB opens: mix value and bluffs – 10–15% 3‑bet frequency; include Axs, Kxs, suited connectors.
    • Fold only the weakest offsuit hands to a large 3‑bet; against tight opponents tighten to value‑heavy 3‑bets (QQ+, AK).

  • Small Blind (open ~20–35%; defend wide):

    • Open with a polarized mix: strong hands and many suited/connected holdings. Open sizing 2.5–3bb; vs limp raise to 3.5–4bb.
    • 3‑bet frequency vs BTN/CO steals: 6–12% (value + suited‑ace/two‑way bluffs like A5s, K9s, 65s).
    • Fold to 4‑bet unless holding JJ+/AK with SPR support.

  • Big Blind (defend 15–40% depending on open and stack):

    • Versus standard BTN steal, defend ~30% (call or 3‑bet mix). Use larger 3‑bet sizes when out of position with strong hands (QQ+, AK) and smaller 3‑bets with blockers (A5s, K9s).
    • Fold very weak offsuit wide hands to large open raises when facing isolation pressure.

• 3‑bet construction (value vs bluff composition)

  • When IP: include ~60–70% value and 30–40% bluffs in the 3‑bet range; when OOP reduce bluffs to 20–30%.
  • Bluff candidates: suited aces with weak kickers (A5s–A2s), broadway suited with blocker value (KQs less bluffy), and suited connectors (98s, 87s) mainly versus CO/BTN opens.
  • Value candidates: JJ+, AKo, AQo/AQs depending on position of opener.

• Folding thresholds and quick rules vs 3‑bets

  • Facing a 3‑bet from EP: fold most speculative offsuit and marginal hands (ATo, KTo, QJo). Call only with suited connectors if SPR > 4 and deep stacks; prefer folding otherwise.
  • Facing a 3‑bet from CO/BTN: defend wider – call with suited connectors, medium pairs (55–99), and ATo+ when implied odds and position are favorable; 3‑bet bluff more frequently.
  • Stack <60bb: tighten call range vs 3‑bets – commit to 4‑bet/shove with strong value (JJ+/AK) and fold marginal holdings.

• Adjustments vs opponent types

  • Aggressive openers: tighten opens from EP by ~25%, widen 3‑bet value share and reduce bluff share; use larger 3‑bet sizes to exploit wide open ranges.
  • Passive openers: widen opens by ~10–15%, incorporate more suited connectors and speculative hands; 3‑bet less often, but bluff with hands that have decent postflop playability.
  • Short stack dynamics (<40bb): reduce bluff 3‑bets, increase shove frequency with strong hands; open sizes can be reduced slightly to induce folds.

• Quick cheat‑sheet (100bb, 6‑max)

  1. Open sizes: EP 2.5bb (12%), MP 2.5bb (16–20%), CO 2.5bb (25–30%), BTN 2.5bb (45–60%), SB 2.5–3bb (20–35).
  2. 3‑bet sizing vs 2.5bb open: 9–11bb. 3‑bet ranges: EP opens → 3‑bet 3–5% (value heavy); CO opens → 3‑bet 6–10%; BTN opens → 3‑bet 8–15%.
  3. Fold: ATo, KTo, most offsuit connectors to EP 3‑bets; call or 3‑bet some of those vs late position 3‑bets depending on stack and opponent tendencies.

Apply these numbers as starting points and adjust by ±20% based on table composition, stack depths, and opponent tendencies; prioritize position, stack interplay, and sizing consistency when expanding or tightening ranges.

Postflop Lines: Decision Criteria – Calling, Folding, Bluffing

Short recommendation: Call when hand equity ≥ required equity implied by pot odds and realistic implied odds; fold when equity < required equity and no backdoor or implied compensation exists; bluff when opponent's fold probability exceeds the break-even bluff frequency and you hold relevant blockers or positional initiative.

Calling – numerical test: Facing a bet B into pot P, call cost = B, pot after a call = P + 2B, required equity = B / (P + 2B). Practical benchmarks: 1/3 pot bet → 20% required; 1/2 pot → 25%; 1x pot → 33.3%; 2x pot → 40%. Include backdoor equity: add half of backdoor outs’ raw probability on turn+river when assessing marginal calls. Add implied odds when stack behind > 3× pot and your hand can improve to dominate.

Folding – negative EV signals: Opponent’s line shows range heavily weighted toward dominated but non-bluff hands, your blockers are weak, pot odds demand >35% equity and you only hold <20% raw equity, multiway pot reduces realizable equity. Reverse implied odds: fold when completing draws likely yields second-best hand at showdown despite meeting immediate pot-odds. If effective stack / pot (SPR) > 6 and your hand is single-pair or worse without nuts or strong redraws, lean to fold.

Bluffing – frequency math: Required unexploitable bluff fraction q = B / (P + B). Examples: betting 1/3 pot → q = 25%; 1/2 pot → q = 33.3%; 1× pot → q = 50%. Make a bluff only when your estimate of opponent fold probability > q. Increase bluff frequency when you hold 1–2 primary blockers to opponent’s strong combos (ace or nut-suited singletons), when opponent has shown high fold rates on similar lines, or when position grants last-action advantage.

Blockers and combo removal: Quantify blockers roughly: holding a critical card often cuts opponent two-card combo counts by ~30–50% depending on ranks. Adjust opponent’s nut-combo estimates downward accordingly when computing fold probability. Example: opponent has KQ combos; you hold a K, expected KQ combos drop substantially, raising bluff success odds.

SPR guidance: Compute SPR = effective stack / pot at flop. Use thresholds: SPR ≤ 1 → commit with top pair or sizable draws; SPR 1–3 → favor simplified value lines and polarized bluffs; SPR 3–6 → prioritize strong made hands and selective big bluffs with blockers; SPR > 6 → avoid marginal calls and thin bluffs, seek strong equity realization or check-fold lines.

Multiway and opponent types: Multiway pots reduce fold equity dramatically; require much stronger hand equity to continue. Versus calling-station opponents, shrink bluff frequency to near zero and widen calling ranges against their isolation bets. Versus highly aggressive, sticky players, widen value-betting and tighten bluffs to blocker-heavy river shoves only when calculated fold probability justifies risk.

Concrete decision checklist: 1) Compute required equity using B / (P + 2B). 2) Estimate raw hand equity plus backdoor contribution. 3) Add implied odds if stack behind > 3× pot and hand can turn into dominating holdings. 4) If equity ≥ required → call/raise. 5) If equity < required → test bluff viability: estimate opponent fold rate, compare to q = B / (P + B), include blocker effect. 6) If fold rate > q → bluff; else fold.

Execution notes: Use smaller bet sizes to extract wider calling ranges when you have value, bigger polarized sizes when bluffing with high fold-requirement targets. Prefer position when making thin calls or bluffs. Track actual opponent fold frequencies over 20–50 similar spots and update estimates numerically; rely on arithmetic above, not intuition alone.

Adjusting to Player Types: Countering TAGs, LAGs, and Calling Stations

3-bet light 8–12% of hands against TAG open-raises when you have position and effective stacks ≥40bb; use 2.2–2.6× the open-raise to maximize fold equity and isolate weaker ranges.

TAG adjustments

Typical TAG open frequency: 12–20%. Versus that profile: 3-bet value share 4–6% (QQ+, AK), 3-bet bluffs 4–6% (Axs, Kxs, suited connectors with backdoor equity). Increase 3-bet bluff density when villain’s fold-to-3bet >55%. Postflop: c-bet on dry textures 45–55% using 40–55% pot sizing; second-barrel only with ~40% of range advantage or strong equity (>40%). Versus TAG continuation frequencies <50%, widen river bluff catchers with blockers (A♠, K♠) and size at 65–80% pot to exploit high fold rates.

LAG adjustments

LAG open frequency: 22–35%. Tighten 3-bet value range to 5–8% (JJ+, AK, AQs) and reduce light 3-bets to 2–4% unless you can isolate in position. Use flatter call range more often when OOP to realize equity: call with suited broadways, medium pairs, and suited connectors 10–18% of hands. Postflop: prefer pot control on wet boards; check-call with medium strength and pot-size/60–80% pot value bets with two-pair+ or strong draws. Use check-raise bluffs selectively on coordinated boards when opponent shows high c-bet frequency (>65%). Versus aggressive squeeze lines, 4-bet shove frequency rises if effective stacks <35bb and opponent's 4-bet fold <30%.

Opponent Type	Open % (approx)	Preflop Adjustments	Postflop Plan	Bet Sizes
TAG	12–20%	3-bet value 4–6%; 3-bet bluffs 4–6% vs fold-to-3bet >55%; isolate in position	C-bet on dry boards 45–55%; second barrel with >40% equity; use blockers on river bluffs	2.2–2.6× open; c-bet 40–55% pot; river bluffs 65–80% pot
LAG	22–35%	Tighten 3-bet value 5–8%; reduce light 3-bets to 2–4%; flat more OOP	Pot control on wet boards; check-call medium strength; exploit high c-bet freq with check-raise bluffs	3-bet sizing 2.5–3×; value bets 60–80% pot; check-raise ~0.6–0.8 pot
Calling Station	open % variable; call-heavy postflop	Tighten bluff frequency preflop; widen thin value range; avoid fancy bluffs	Bet thin and frequently on all streets with value; bluff rarely; prioritize hands that pair board or have big backdoor equity	Value bets 60–80% pot; small probe bets 30–40% pot when checking to induce calls

Calling stations: prioritize extraction. Increase single-street value bets with top pair+ and sets; prefer 60–80% pot sizes on rivers where showdown value is high. Reduce multi-street bluffing frequency to <10% of hands; when bluffing choose hands with strong blockers and clean equity. Versus short stacks (<30bb) push thin value with hands that are ahead of calling ranges (AQ+, 77+).

Q&A:

How realistic is the goal of making consistent profit on Bass Win Casino poker?

Consistent profit is possible, but it depends on skill level, volume, game selection and variance. For cash games, strong players measure success in big blinds per 100 hands (BB/100); a solid recreational player can expect single-digit BB/100 while a winning regular targets double digits. For tournaments, look at return on investment (ROI) and in-the-money (ITM) rates; variance is higher so sample sizes must be large. Also factor in rake and tournament fees — they reduce the edge. Track your results over thousands of hands or hundreds of tournaments before judging sustainability and adjust your target profit rate to match the real edge you observe.

What bankroll rules should I follow for cash games and MTTs on Bass Win?

Use conservative bankroll rules to survive downswings. For ring games (no-limit hold’em), keep at least 20–40 buy-ins for the stakes you play; if you play short-handed or against tough opponents, increase that to 50–100 buy-ins. For sit-and-go tournaments, 50–100 buy-ins per buy-in level is a common guideline. For large-field multi-table tournaments (MTTs), keep 200–300 buy-ins because variance is greater. Reduce stake size or take fewer risks when your bankroll drops below the guideline, and consider a stop-loss per session (for example, 10–20 buy-ins) to prevent tilt-driven losses. Rebuild by moving down and studying until your edge returns.

Which in-game adjustments produce the biggest improvement against typical Bass Win opponents?

Start with table selection and position awareness. Play more hands from late position and loosen early position play only against weak defenders. Increase value-betting frequency against calling stations and tighten up versus aggressive 3-bettors. Pay attention to stack sizes—shallow stacks change shove/fold decisions. Mix bet sizes: use larger value bets when opponents call too often and smaller ones to get multiple streets from sticky opponents. When specific opponents fold too much, add more bluffs on appropriate runouts; when they call down light, reduce bluffs and focus on thin value. Observing tendencies and adjusting exploitatively will often yield faster gains than strict balanced play at lower stakes.

What tools and stats should I use to improve my play on Bass Win, and are there any restrictions?

Hand histories, session reviews and note-taking are universally useful. If Bass Win permits HUDs or trackers, a lightweight tracker showing VPIP, PFR, 3-bet, fold-to-3-bet and showdown frequency can highlight exploitable leaks. Even without a HUD, keep structured notes on regular opponents: how they react to 3-bets, continuation bets and check-raises. Use solver work off-line to explore optimal ranges for common spots, then practice simplified adjustments at the tables. Always check Bass Win’s terms of service before using third-party tools—some sites restrict HUDs or automated assistance. If a tool is disallowed, rely on manual review, playback of hand histories and focused study sessions instead.

How do I prevent tilt and maintain focus to protect my profit over time?

Set clear session goals and limits: number of hands, maximum buy-ins to lose, and time. Take breaks between sessions and stop play after a few bad sessions rather than chasing losses. Develop a ritual to reset—breathing, short walk, or reviewing a single strategic point—and keep a short log of emotional state after each session to identify persistent triggers. Practice disciplined bankroll rules and avoid high-variance spots when tired or angry. Regular physical rest, hydration and reducing distractions help decision quality. If tilt recurs, spend some sessions on low-stakes tables while reviewing hands to rebuild confidence.

How should I manage my bankroll at Bass Win Casino to produce steady profit from poker?

Bankroll control is the single most reliable way to protect your long-term edge. Treat your poker funds as a business account: set a separate poker bankroll and never mix it with living expenses. Choose stakes where typical session swings are a small fraction of your total bankroll — a practical rule is 20–30 buy-ins for cash games and 300–500 buy-ins for tournament play, adjusted for your personal risk tolerance and skill level. Use stop-loss and stop-win limits for sessions to prevent tilt and lock in gains. Track results by stake and format so you can spot leaks and adjust quickly; small leaks compound fast. Move up only after sustained positive results and adequate roll growth, not after a few big wins. Conversely, move down immediately after a losing run that eats into your safety margin. Maintain a short checklist before every session: bankroll status, recent results, physical/mental readiness, and a clear objective (e.g., exploit weak players, focus on position). Finally, keep an emergency cushion outside your poker funds so you never feel forced to play higher stakes under pressure.

Sex Cams